A Call for Inclusive Language in Science Classes
Submit Your Online Inquiry
Inquire Now
Inquire Now

The nature of the science curriculum often requires us to teach about gender and sex. While many view science as an unbiased area of knowledge, that simply is not the case. We often unintentionally promote gender and heteronormative stereotypes. With a few easy language swaps, we can create a class culture that helps every learner feel safe and well-represented. Here are a few examples.
Things I used to say
|
→
|
Things I’m trying to say instead
|
Boys are born with XY chromosomes
|
→
|
Biological males are born with XY chromosomes
|
Female anatomy includes ovaries, uterus, etc
|
→
|
Most biological females are born with ovaries, uterus, etc., but there are many cases where this is not true and every body is different.
|
The male testicles are the site of sperm production
|
→
|
Testicles are the site of sperm production
|
Rosalind Franklin was a female scientist who…
|
→
|
Rosalind Franklin was a scientist who…
|
Girls go through puberty earlier than boys
|
→
|
People born with biologically female anatomy sometimes go through puberty earlier than people born with biologically male anatomy
|
If a man and a woman have a baby, what is the probability that their child will be a boy?
|
→
|
What is the probability that a child will be born with XY chromosomes?
|
Perhaps in the not-so-distant future someone else will be writing an article about replacing these terms with even more inclusive language. Great! We have an obligation not only to speak, but to listen. And reflect. And be open to new ideas. As scientists we consistently use new data to question established ideas, and we should be doing the same about the language we use in our teaching practices.
Cheryl Hickman
Secondary School Science Teacher